By the authority left in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is therefore ordered:
Section 1. Aim. A principle of the foundation of the United States is that all citizens are also treated under the law. This principle guarantees equality of opportunities, not equal results. He promises that people are treated as individuals, not components of a particular breed or group. He encourages meritocracy and a Daltonian society, and not favoritism based on race or sex. Membership of this principle is essential to create opportunities, encourage success and maintain the American dream.
But a pernicious movement endangers this fundamental principle, seeking to transform the promise of equality of equality of America into a pursuit of division of results predetermined by unrelevant immutable characteristics, regardless of individual forces, efforts or success. A key tool for this movement is a disparate impact responsibility, which argues that there is an almost insurmountable presumption of illegal discrimination when there are differences in results in certain circumstances between the different races, the sexes or the similar groups, even if there is no opportunity for success. The responsibility for the disparate impact requires that individuals and companies are considering the race and engaging in racial balancing to avoid potentially paralyzing legal responsibility. It undermines not only our national values, but also takes place in the same protection under the law and, consequently, violates our constitution.
On the practical level, the responsibility for the disparate impact prevented companies from making job decisions and other job decisions based on merit and skills, their needs or the needs of their customers because of the spectrum that such a process could lead to disparate results, and therefore prosecution for disparate impact. This has made things difficult, and in some cases impossible, for employers to use evaluations focused on good faith during recruitment, which prevents job seekers from being twinned by jobs to which their skills are most suitable – in other words, it deprives them of possibilities of success. Due to the responsibility of the disparate impact, employers cannot act in the best interest of the job seeker, the employer and the American public.
The responsibility for the disparate impact endorses the effectiveness of civil rights laws by obliging demanding discrimination rather than proscribing. As the Supreme Court said, ”
Second. 2. Policy. It is from the United States policy to eliminate the use of the responsibility of the disparate impact in all the contexts in the maximum possible degree to avoid violating the Constitution, federal laws on civil rights and fundamental American ideals.
Second 3. Revoke certain presidential actions. The following presidential approvals of the regulations promulgated under 42 USC 2000D-1 are revoked:
a) The presidential approval of July 25, 1966 of the Regulation of the Ministry of Justice Title VI (31 Fed. Reg. 10269), as appropriate for 28 CFR 42.104 (b) (2) in full; And
(b) The presidential approval of July 5, 1973 of the regulation of the Ministry of Justice Title VI (38 Fed. Register. 17955, fr Doc. 73-13407), as appropriate for the words “or effect” in the two places, they appear in 28 CFR 42.104 (B) (3), and as applied to 28 CFR 42.104 (B) (6) (II) and 28 CFR 42.104 (C) (2) in full.
Second. 4. Application discretion to ensure legal governance. Given the limited resources for the application of executive departments and agencies (agencies), the Illtomudifassion of the responsibility of the impact disappears 42.104 (B) (6) (II) and 28 CFR 42.104 (C) (2).
Second. 5. Existing regulations. a) As a delegate by the executive decree 12250 of November 2, 1980 (leadership and the coordination of non-discrimination laws), the Attorney General opens the appropriate measures to repeal or modify the regulations for implementing title VI of the civil rights law of 1964 for all agencies insofar as they envisage responsibility for the responsibility for the disappearance.
(b) within 30 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General, in coordination with the heads of all the other agencies, is the president, through the assistant of the president for the internal policy:
(i) all the existing regulations, orientations, rules or ordinances which impose responsibility for a disparate impact or similar requirements, and of detail the stages of the agency for their amendment or their repeal, if necessary under the applicable law; And
(ii) other laws or decisions, including at the level of the State, which impose responsibility for a disparate impact and any appropriate measure to combat any constitutional or other infirmity.
Second. 6. Examination of current questions. (a) within 45 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General and the Chairman of the Equal Employment Commission evaluate all pending surveys, civil proceedings or positions taken in the current issues under each federal law on civil rights within the framework of their respective jurisdictions, in particular the title VII of the law on civil rights of 1964, A theory of disgusting responsibility, and will take appropriate actions with respect for the question of the police order.
(b) within 45 days of the date of this ordinance, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Office, President of the Federal Trade Commission, and heads of other agencies responsible for the application of the Civil Rights Act (the Housing Act (Law on Housing (Law. The prohibition of acts or unjust practices The current procedures based on theories of liability with disparate impact and take the appropriate measures with regard to these questions in accordance with the policy of this order.
(c) Within 90 days of the date of this ordinance, all agencies assess existing consent judgments and permanent injunctions which are based on the theories of responsibility for the disparate impact and take the appropriate measures with regard to these questions in accordance with the policy of this order.
Second. 7. Action of the Future Agency. (a) In coordination with other agencies, the Attorney General determines whether the federal authorities pre -empt the laws, regulations, policies or practices of states which impose responsibility for a disappeared impact based on a characteristic protected by the federal government such as race, gender or age, or if these laws, regulations, policies or practices have constitutional infirmities which guarantee the federal action, and appropriate in accordance with policy of politics.
(b) The Attorney General and the President of the equal employment committee formulate and jointly emit guidelines or technical assistance to employers concerning appropriate methods to promote equal access to employment, that the applicant has collegial training, if necessary.
Second. 8. Semetability. If a provision of this order, or the application of a provision to a person or a circumstance, is considered to be invalid, the rest of this order and the application of its other provisions to other persons or circumstances will not be affected as well.
Second. 9. General provisions. a) Nothing in this order should be interpreted as altering or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, an agency or its head; Or
(ii) the functions of the director of the management and budget office relating to budgetary, administrative or legislative proposals.
(b) This order must be implemented in accordance with the applicable law and subject to the availability of credits.
(c) This order is not intended to create and create a right or advantage, a noun or procedure, enforceable in law or equity by a party against the United States, its services, agencies or entities, its officers, employees or agents, or any other person.
Donald J. Trump
The White House,
April 23, 2025.
