The global legal landscape can be a maze, especially when
multinational companies are caught between competing jurisdictions.
A recent court saga involving Google, Russian media firms, and
South African trade marks highlights this tension perfectly.
*Image credit: Wikimedia commons
The background
Russian Court Fines: After Google blocked the YouTube channels
of three Russian media groups — allegedly owned or controlled
by sanctioned individuals — a Russian court imposed massive
fines on Google. These fines grew weekly and, according to court
documents, ballooned into the astronomical figure of $125 nonillion
(yes, that’s a “1” with 30 zeros!).
Global Enforcements: In an effort to recover the fines, the
Russian media companies launched enforcement actions in various
jurisdictions, including South Africa, Spain, and Vietnam.
The IP (trade mark) issue in South Africa
Despite the staggering size of the fines, one local detail
caught particular attention:
A South African court froze Google’s local trade marks (and
shares) to potentially satisfy the Russian court judgment. Since
trade marks are a form of intellectual property (IP), they became a
prime target for enforcement by the Russian media companies. These
SA-based trade marks were effectively tied up pending the outcome
of enforcement proceedings.
Why trade marks?
Trade marks are valuable business assets. If successfully
attached, they can be sold or leveraged to settle debts. Attaching
the local trade marks was a strategic move by the Russian claimants
to force Google’s hand in paying or negotiating the fines.
The dispute and the recent developments
Google’s response
Google argued that the Russian fines were unlawful, particularly
as they stemmed from demands to reinstate YouTube channels
belonging to sanctioned individuals. In both the UK and the US,
Google sought injunctions to block enforcement of these fines,
fearing that courts worldwide might seize its assets (including
local IP rights).
UK court ruling
A recent UK judgment blocked the Russian media firms from
seizing Google’s global assets, citing the punitive and
astronomically disproportionate nature of the fines. The UK
court’s stance signals caution to other jurisdictions,
potentially influencing how South African courts view similar
enforcement claims.
SA court order on hold
The South African court order that initially froze Google’s
trade marks was put on hold. While the matter hasn’t reached
final resolution in South Africa, the UK ruling may bolster
Google’s argument that the enforcement attempts are excessive
and should not be entertained.
The takeaway
The Google vs. Russian media dispute is more than just a
headline; it’s a cautionary tale about the power of trade marks
and local courts in international disputes.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
